tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19923729.post4259168469466852726..comments2023-09-05T08:34:20.322-04:00Comments on susan the bruce: Vagina's and Children First! Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger30125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19923729.post-20548059067402991352013-04-26T17:09:40.284-04:002013-04-26T17:09:40.284-04:00I get 1:20 Anonymous = you are a personal friend o...I get 1:20 Anonymous = you are a personal friend of the HansenAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19923729.post-67202144689586735262013-04-26T17:06:47.609-04:002013-04-26T17:06:47.609-04:001:21 Anonymous are you for real? this isnt about n...1:21 Anonymous are you for real? this isnt about name calling at all. dont let a few bad apples spoil the whole bunch, girl lolAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19923729.post-66677482983870360222013-04-26T17:04:41.700-04:002013-04-26T17:04:41.700-04:00its amazing that this story died a natural death, ...its amazing that this story died a natural death, but i'll send his competitor some cash when she emerges LMAOAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19923729.post-67465157334146063382013-04-20T00:50:23.986-04:002013-04-20T00:50:23.986-04:00Amen.Amen.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19923729.post-12203941828382085572013-04-18T15:20:56.149-04:002013-04-18T15:20:56.149-04:00It's not the word. It's the context he us...It's not the word. It's the context he used it in. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19923729.post-81058503462704264242013-04-18T13:54:10.270-04:002013-04-18T13:54:10.270-04:00To be fair, you made the mistake of assuming your ...To be fair, you made the mistake of assuming your meaning was clear, when it wasn't. Compounding it with passive-aggressive behavior (twice) doesn't make you look any smarter either.<br /><br />Of course, there is always the chance I'm assuming you're being passive-aggressive, when in fact you are merely helpful and supportive even in the face of adversity.Squirrelhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05981488851865840713noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19923729.post-10265444207381675112013-04-18T13:20:49.108-04:002013-04-18T13:20:49.108-04:00Wow! Susan the Bruce ,your sarcasm and veiled insu...Wow! Susan the Bruce ,your sarcasm and veiled insult is remarkable. Anon above I agree with you. Clearly the whole story is not presented in this posting. The two things I find most unfortunate are: 1) that the uproar is over Rep Hanson's use of a word which some find as vulgar (Possessing my own vagina I really am not offended) or that he as a white male and a republican (gasp) should say such a thing,is overshadowing what the debate is supposed to be about: HB 135: and 2) that "all you all" (having lived south of the Mason Dixon line for the first 29 years of my life I use to mean everyone that has posted or replied here) resort to name calling when you disagree with someone. So now feel free to attack all my grammatical errors and my personal character because that is what the thought police and Big Brother are expecting. :) Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19923729.post-1165162587804648322013-04-18T04:11:00.797-04:002013-04-18T04:11:00.797-04:00True "anonymous"...but with all of the n...True "anonymous"...but with all of the nonsense coming out of the political world in the past few years, I bet the whole story won't summon up much more logic. <br /><br />My letter would start: Dear Mrs. Hansen...<br /><br />but I could be off the mark. I can't think straight when my vagina is bitching...zag001ahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16476251660958438850noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19923729.post-67954303433322252572013-04-18T00:44:17.177-04:002013-04-18T00:44:17.177-04:00Greetings Mr Hansen,
It has come to my attention...Greetings Mr Hansen, <br /><br />It has come to my attention that you have used the New Hampshire House email system to transmit a communication that is derogatory to women.<br /><br /> I found this response to you from Rick Watrous, who most chivalrously cautioned you about your offensive language. <br /><br />From: Watrous, Rick<br />Sent: Monday, April 01, 2013 9:12 PM<br />To: Hansen, Peter<br /><br />Rep. Hansen,<br /><br />"Children and vagina's"??!! Are you really using "vaginas" as a crude catch-all for women? Really?<br /><br />Please think before you send out such offensive language on the legislative listserve.<br /><br />Rep Rick Watrous<br /><br /> Yowza, here is your scorching response to Rep Watrous:<br /><br />On Apr 2, 2013, at 3:30 PM, "Hansen, Peter" wrote:<br /><br />Rep Watrous,<br />Having a fairly well educated mind I do not need self appointed wardens to A: try to put words in my mouth for political gain and B: Turn a well founded strategy in communication into an insulting accusation, and finally if you find the noun vagina insulting or in some way offensive then perhaps a better exercise might be for you to re-examine your psyche.<br /><br />Rep Peter Hansen<br /><br /><br /><br /> YOU sound like YOU are insulted and offended when he writes to you, "Dude, don't call the ladies THAT." LOL: and you wrote him that you don't need him putting words in your mouth! Are you kidding? You referred to all women as Vaginas, then you set about to OWN IT, and you tell HIM to not put words in YOUR mouth! Sweet jujubes! MTV couldn't write a reality show sillier than what you just said! Back to your email in which you are OWNING IT... "IF you find the noun "vagina" insulting or in some way offensive then perhaps a better exercise might be for you to re-examine your psyche" Clearly you are defending your use of the noun vagina in the context of the original email which refers to females as vaginas. (No apostrophe needed to pluralize the noun "vagina.") And yes, you do sound like a very smart man who has been educated.<br /><br /> Your reference to women as vaginas in the context of your original emails means that you do not value women except for the role their vaginas play. Vaginas are used during coitus to receive the penis for purposes of reproduction. Vaginas are used during birth to allow the baby to exit the body. After that, I cannot think of any other common uses for a vagina. You do realize, I hope, a vagina is internalized in the human body and is not visible to the outside, right? I also want to be sure that you know that women don't receive sexual pleasure directly from their vaginas, right? <br /><br />So for you to say that "children and vaginas" are missing from the supporting anecdotes to persuade a decision to retreat, it is like you are saying that children and human beings that are only valued as sexual receptacles for males are missing from the supporting anecdotes. <br /><br />You know, I wouldn't have to be all up in yo' business if you hadn't made it personal. You have said to me "I don't see you as a citizen, nor as person with dignity and rights; I only see you as a receptacle to receive a penis for reproductive purposes." <br /><br />No matter how scientifically or socially acceptable you think the word "vagina" is, the context in which you said "vaginas" is utterly repugnant. You have used it in the same context that the word "cunt" is usually used in. Even though you chose the noun "vagina," everyone knows you meant it in the same coarse, vulgar, guttural, demeaning, way as "cunt." You have labeled yourself a woman-hater.<br /><br />Yes, I am insulted and offended. Not that you used the word "vagina," but the context in which you used it.<br /><br />There is NO apology you can make that doesn't make you look like a misogynistic fool.<br /><br /><br />Just resign your office, you are a disgusting disgrace. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19923729.post-4697381444826722522013-04-17T20:46:49.338-04:002013-04-17T20:46:49.338-04:00Dear Most Recent Anonymous - it's always a tre...Dear Most Recent Anonymous - it's always a treat to hear from a true intellectual. susanthehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05960705109051557790noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19923729.post-67884929117956979652013-04-17T20:38:54.211-04:002013-04-17T20:38:54.211-04:00I can't take offense to something when I don&#...I can't take offense to something when I don't know the whole story. When I see the original Email in whole that was sent, then and only then, will I be offended or once again, think you all are idiots. That's what is wrong with you sheep! You are waiting like lapdogs for the next media outlet to tell you how to feel, vote, eat, sleep, etc. Republican or Democrat you are all fools!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19923729.post-14221287855025021372013-04-17T18:42:57.358-04:002013-04-17T18:42:57.358-04:00No, not because they agree with his choice of word...No, not because they agree with his choice of words. Not because he has a dick. Because he IS a dick. See, unlike the word vagina, the word dick has another meaning...Sorry, but I felt the need to spell that out for you as if you were a toddler, since you seemed confused about what samiinh was saying.WTFnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19923729.post-42576414151349055002013-04-17T17:48:15.206-04:002013-04-17T17:48:15.206-04:00does anyone thing that perhaps he stupidly wrote &...does anyone thing that perhaps he stupidly wrote "vagina's" in a facetious manner?<br />No.<br />He wrote vaginas because like most conservative men, that's all he thinks women are.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19923729.post-38120175645924878952013-04-17T16:43:16.243-04:002013-04-17T16:43:16.243-04:00Wow, Hansen is a real moron.
Jacob, stop digging...Wow, Hansen is a real moron. <br /><br />Jacob, stop digging, LOL!<br /><br />Both seem good @ blaming others for their deficiencies...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19923729.post-24248543121183986362013-04-17T16:20:57.916-04:002013-04-17T16:20:57.916-04:00I've read through the comments and agree with ...I've read through the comments and agree with them, but to raise a question, does anyone thing that perhaps he stupidly wrote "vagina's" in a facetious manner? Not towards women but towards whatever he is referencing that the speaker left out in an attempt to make that person look foolish? Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19923729.post-83872389521911474792013-04-17T13:43:36.904-04:002013-04-17T13:43:36.904-04:00That's excellent, Jacob. You've made your ...That's excellent, Jacob. You've made your failure to read the story before commenting my fault! Nice work. <br /><br />susanthehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05960705109051557790noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19923729.post-42088581158123163842013-04-17T13:41:30.087-04:002013-04-17T13:41:30.087-04:00Of course, Susan. Had the author of THIS article ...Of course, Susan. Had the author of THIS article put "vagina's" in quotes, there wouldn't have been a problem. That or "sic". I shall delete my comment above.jacobhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07315630147854754132noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19923729.post-603642095024304452013-04-17T12:31:05.900-04:002013-04-17T12:31:05.900-04:00Jacob - it's always wise to read the story bef...Jacob - it's always wise to read the story before you comment. susanthehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05960705109051557790noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19923729.post-49513245641036571482013-04-17T12:29:42.342-04:002013-04-17T12:29:42.342-04:00This comment has been removed by the author.jacobhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07315630147854754132noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19923729.post-26778804070848378512013-04-17T10:52:08.575-04:002013-04-17T10:52:08.575-04:00Then it would appear you don't have a problem ...Then it would appear you don't have a problem with the Representatives choice of words.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19923729.post-54705693214496997242013-04-17T08:47:13.621-04:002013-04-17T08:47:13.621-04:00the best of analogies
the best of analogies<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19923729.post-38832371736154472012013-04-17T06:02:59.221-04:002013-04-17T06:02:59.221-04:00You are correct, Anonymous, strictly speaking, how...You are correct, Anonymous, strictly speaking, however, "dick" seems much more appropriate, colloquially.samiinhhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11987486046804082530noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19923729.post-12827081125594282002013-04-16T23:32:16.937-04:002013-04-16T23:32:16.937-04:00That's absolutely appalling and shameful!That's absolutely appalling and shameful!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19923729.post-40867050149807832002013-04-16T21:06:27.557-04:002013-04-16T21:06:27.557-04:00The proper corollary would be 'penis', not...The proper corollary would be 'penis', not 'dick' saminh. ;-) While I wouldn't want to be categorized as a vagina, the word itself is a perfectly acceptable term for a part of my anatomy. This circumstance could be hilariously funny as an SNL sketch. Unfortunately, this fellow is not a comedian. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19923729.post-18366709375169385992013-04-16T14:03:59.602-04:002013-04-16T14:03:59.602-04:00samiinh, your comment is perfect! Thanks for makin...samiinh, your comment is perfect! Thanks for making it clear. :-)habhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01919337651754996090noreply@blogger.com