Showing posts with label disrespectful. Show all posts
Showing posts with label disrespectful. Show all posts
Monday, March 16, 2015
NH Legislators Teach Fourth Grade Class a Lesson
Mr. Cutting's fourth grade class at the Lincoln Ackerman School in Hampton Falls did something this year that many other fourth grade classes have done over the years. They decided to get involved in the legislative process by proposing a bill and following along as it progressed through the legislature. Their bill, HB 373 , would have named the red tailed hawk as the official NH state raptor.
NH is a state that has an official state song and 8 honorary state songs. We have an official state butterfly, a state insect, and a state amphibian. We have an official state saltwater game fish and an official state fresh water game fish. We are not afraid of state symbols or songs.
This year there was a glut of similar legislation. A state poem, a state fossil, and an official state wild cat were also headed to the House floor. The bill to name the bobcat as the official state wild cat passed. The others are doomed. It may be that the wildcat bill was assigned to the Fish and Game committee. It might be that the wildcat bill emanated from a private school. In a legislature dominated by public school hating Republicans, that might have made a difference. Or maybe it was just too many bills all at once for a legislature already strained by political strife and epic levels of incivility.
Mr. Cutting's class testified before the Environment and Agriculture Committee, and did such a good job that the bill came out of committee with a recommendation of OTP (ought to pass) on a vote of 10-8. This wasn't a ringing committee endorsement, but it was an endorsement, nonetheless. On March 12, the day of the session, the bill was special ordered to be the first bill taken up. The gallery was packed with Mr. Cutting's fourth grade class and their parents.
From the moment the bill was introduced by the Speaker, things went really, really wrong. Angry legislators (from both parties) excoriated the students for wasting their time. For those who need a reminder, these kids are 9 and 10 years old. Representative Christy Bartlett testified at length. After criticizing the choice of the red tailed hawk, she seemed intent on teaching the kids a lesson that NOT EVERY BILL PASSES.
Representative Warren Groen gave his first bizarre performance of the day. (It was not his last) He spoke about how the red tailed hawk has talons and a razor sharp beak. He described how the hawk grasps its prey with the talons then rips its victim to shreds - tears it apart limb by limb. Representative Groen then announced that the hawk would serve as a much better mascot for Planned Parenthood. Yes, this was how Groen chose to address the fourth graders and their parents who were sitting in the gallery - with this peculiar and inappropriate tirade.
Then along came Representative John Burt, who thinks he has a great sense of humor. Burt announced that a constituent named "Big Chicken" sent him to speak. This was supposed to be funny because hawk, big chicken...okay, well it wasn't funny. He then went on to complain that NH has a 10 billion dollar budget we should be working on, and that if we keep bringing more of these bills forward, which we shoon't, we'll be having a state hot dog next. This is supposed to be funny, because Burt puts on a self-aggrandizing hot dog shindig every year on the State House lawn.
These were fourth graders, visiting the People's House. Representative Burt's performance was obnoxious and disrespectful.
This is how adults serving in our legislature chose to comport themselves in front of a fourth grade class. These students were there because they embarked upon a project that was intended to teach them about how the NH legislature functions (or dysfunctions) and how a bill becomes law. They had one heck of a learning experience.
See for yourself - the video starts with HB 373 - it's only a few minutes.
These fourth graders, their families, and their school deserve an apology. If our legislators can't manage to do better than bullying ten year olds, they ought to resign.
Labels:
bizarre,
bullying,
disrespectful,
fourth grade class,
HB 373,
Lincoln Ackerman School,
Mr. Cutting,
NH House,
obnoxious,
Rep. Bartlett,
Rep. Burt,
Rep. Groen
Thursday, August 01, 2013
GOP Leadership Should Take Their Shovels Away
The discussion continues on the NH House legislative email system. A system for legislators to communicate with one another and their constituents about NH issues and legislation.
This began as a discussion about gun bans. There isn't a gun ban proposed in NH. Why is this even being discussed? That's simple enough. The NH GOP would rather bleat about their fevered, paranoid imaginings than actually deal with the very real problems we have in this state. If only they spent all this time discussing how best to deal with NH's failing infrastructure.
My comments are in a large, bolded format:
From: "Vadney,Herb" Subject: RE: Gun BanDate: August 1, 2013 9:37:14 AM EDTTo: "Peterson, Lenette", "Hopper, Gary" , "Ulery, Jordan" , "Grady, Brenda" , "Emerson-Brown, Rebecca" , "Beaudoin, Steven" , "Horrigan,Timothy" , "Smith, Tim" Cc: "Tanner, Linda", "'Wendy A. Piper'" , ~All Representatives
I, too, am troubled by that photo.I'll be darned if I can get it to print.Herb
From: Peterson, Lenette
Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2013 8:50 AM
To: Hopper, Gary; Ulery, Jordan; Grady, Brenda; Emerson-Brown, Rebecca; Beaudoin, Steven; Horrigan,Timothy; Smith, Tim
Cc: Tanner, Linda; 'Wendy A. Piper'; ~All Representatives
Subject: RE: Gun BanExcellent job, Gary, as always most missed the boat! Now hopefully this will end. Go find another cause to be up in arms over, time to put this baby to bed.
Lenette M. Peterson
For those not in the know, Rep. Peterson is a Republican. It's very gracious of her to be so accepting of the drooling fratboy behavior of her male colleagues, as they objectify young women.
From: Gary S Hopper [fourpickles@gsinet.net]
Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2013 12:52 AM
To: Ulery, Jordan; Grady, Brenda; Emerson-Brown, Rebecca; Beaudoin, Steven; Horrigan,Timothy; Smith, Tim
Cc: Tanner, Linda; 'Wendy A. Piper'; ~All Representatives
Subject: Re: Gun BanI wasn't going to chime in because this thread has gone on much long however the fact is I did create the picture.
I did it to draw attention to the issue of the needless killing of hundreds young people in cities like Chicago. The fact that more
people are offended by a girl in shorts rather then the hundreds of kids killed each year in Chicago is pathetic.
The fact that people keep talking about the picture of a girl in short is proof that it worked.
It is true that a teacher in school might get in trouble for using this to illustrate a point in school but your NOT in school.
Gary
Listen up, Gary: You are an elected representative in the state of New Hampshire. Half of your constituents are women. And I'm pretty sure that ALL of those women hate dirty old men. When you post a men's magazine cheesecake photo as an attempt to 'get attention' you should not be surprised by the kind of attention you get. It's not the kind you want. When you post a picture like this, you come across as a creepy geezer: leering, drooling, and ogling young women.
If a young woman's breasts are needed to illustrate your "facts" you're doing facts wrong.
Your female colleagues found your soft porn picture insulting. Instead of apologizing, you keep digging. That makes you disrespectful and rude. And not very smart.
Also - if you want to lecture a teacher, you should make sure your grammar and spelling are impeccable.
At 11:15 PM 7/31/2013, jordanulery@myfairpoint.net wrote:
I did not post the Daisy Duke. I am not defending nor objecting to the post. The purpose of advertising is to get attention. Sometimes it is a cute "animal" (Geico, Kia (dancing mice), corn flakes). Repeatedly demonstrated, across all demographics and whether it is appropriate or not, the adage applies 'sex sells'. In this instance the post was not created by a Member, it was merely cut and paste work. The post did its job - people on the list saw the stats (perhaps only after the model, but it got eye contact). If you don't 'like' the post fine, ignore it. But ignore the rather revealing underware ads in the Sunday paper as well. The post was nothing more or less than an advertisement to adults who can make their own decisions.
Sent on the Sprint® Now Network from my BlackBerry®
Here's a thought, Jordan Ulery: this isn't the Sunday paper. This isn't a lingerie ad. This isn't a television show. This isn't advertising. If you can't get your point across without attaching a set of breasts to it, than you have a communication problem.
We have a name for people who sell sex. We call them pimps. Is that what you're aspiring to, Rep. Ulery?
This is the list serve for the NH House of Representatives - paid for by the tax dollars of your constituents - for the purpose of doing the people's business. This discussion, and your aging fratboy ogling have nothing to do with the people's business. You disgrace the institution with this disrespectful, misogynistic nonsense.
Your comments and this picture offended your female colleagues. Instead of apologizing, you've chosen to continue to justify your conduct, and tell them to "ignore it." It's clear that you have no respect for your female colleagues, and that you have really bad manners.
From: "Brenda Grady" <bbgrady@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 21:01:25 -0400
To: 'Emerson-Brown, Rebecca'<Rebecca.Emerson-Brown@leg.state.nh.us>; 'Beaudoin, Steven'<Steven.Beaudoin@leg.state.nh.us>; 'Ulery, Jordan'<jordanulery@myfairpoint.net>; 'Horrigan,Timothy'<timothy.horrigan@alumni.usc.edu>; 'Smith, Tim'<Tim.Smith@leg.state.nh.us>
Cc: 'Tanner, Linda'<tannerwindom@gmail.com>; 'Wendy A. Piper'<Wendy.A.Piper@dartmouth.edu>; 'Hopper, Gary'<fourpickles@gsinet.net>; '~All Representatives'<HReps@leg.state.nh.us>
Subject: RE: Gun Ban
I also found it offensive. The reason given for its use, ‘to get your attention’, was also offensive as it equated us to a bunch of hormone-driven 18 year olds. As a high school teacher for 30 years, I would have been fired for such an inappropriate way to get the attention of my students. Even they would have known that.
Rep. Brenda Grady
Merrimack
From: Emerson-Brown, Rebecca [ mailto:Rebecca.Emerson-Brown@leg.state.nh.us]
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 6:46 PM
To: Beaudoin, Steven; Ulery, Jordan; Horrigan,Timothy; Smith, Tim
Cc: Tanner, Linda; 'Wendy A. Piper'; Hopper, Gary; ~All Representatives
Subject: RE: Gun Ban
How you find this not to be offensive is beyond me...
Rebecca Emerson-Brown
Email:Rebecca.Emerson-Brown@leg.state.nh.us
Tweet: @RebaEmerson
Post:Facebook.com/RepReba
-------- Original message --------
From: "Beaudoin, Steven" < Steven.Beaudoin@leg.state.nh.us>
Date: 07/30/2013 10:37 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: "Ulery, Jordan" < jordanulery@myfairpoint.net>,"Horrigan,Timothy" < timothy.horrigan@alumni.usc.edu>,"Smith, Tim" < Tim.Smith@leg.state.nh.us>
Cc: "Tanner, Linda" <tannerwindom@gmail.com >,"'Wendy A. Piper'" < Wendy.A.Piper@dartmouth.edu>,"Hopper, Gary" <fourpickles@gsinet.net >,~All Representatives <HReps@leg.state.nh.us>
Subject: RE: Gun Ban
Are you seriously offended by the photo? The photo just happened to be attached to facts I thought pertinent to the discussion.
Steve Beaudoin
N.H. State Representative
Strafford District 9
Rochester
332-9458
Would you have been offended if Rep. Hopper attached a picture of his penis Steve? After all, it would have just happened to be attached to facts you thought pertinent.
Labels:
bad manners,
breasts,
dirty old men,
disrespectful,
drooling,
fratboys,
Jordan Ulery,
misogynists,
NH GOP,
NH House email system,
offensive,
ogling,
Rep. Gary Hopper,
soft porn,
Steve Beaudoin
Wednesday, July 31, 2013
The Party of Patriarchal and Stupid
In today's Telegraph, Kevin Landrigan does some damage control for Rep. Jordan Ulery in his role as cup bearer and tender to the NH GOP media narrative. Whenever Republicans get caught doing something stupid, they immediately try to pass it off as a joke.
I saw the emails. Ulery wasn't joking. He had no idea those were satirical sites. But hey - he says so, and that's good enough for the NH media, where GOP is always the default setting.
As for the picture in question, Ulery and Hopper had this to say:
I saw the emails. Ulery wasn't joking. He had no idea those were satirical sites. But hey - he says so, and that's good enough for the NH media, where GOP is always the default setting.
As for the picture in question, Ulery and Hopper had this to say:
Hopper said the photo is no different than advertising and programs on television going back to the “Dukes of Hazzard” series of the 1970s.
“The picture wasn’t any more offensive than what you can see on TV every night,” Ulery said.
It's awfully big of Ulery and Hopper to tell women what they should be offended by. Until they grow a pair of ovaries, however, they don't get to make that decision for their female colleagues, some of whom expressed their displeasure with the photo.
That's the most stunning thing of all. Hopper and Ulery heard from colleagues who stated that they were offended. In that situation, most of us would apologize profusely.
Not these two. Their response is to tell their colleagues that they don't have any right to be offended. (I'm pretty sure that neither of these ill mannered oafs would be pleased if hot, young male beefcake shots started being circulated by the women.) Their conduct here is disrespectful of their colleagues and flat out RUDE.
These fine patriarchs will make women's reproductive decisions for them, ignore the wage gap in NH, and now - tell women not to be offended by the soft core porn they like to ogle.
Nice to see the GOP working overtime to change their image as the party of stupid.
Labels:
disrespectful,
NH GOP,
patriarchs,
Rep. Hopper,
Rep. Ulery,
rude,
soft core porn
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)