Showing posts with label bad manners. Show all posts
Showing posts with label bad manners. Show all posts

Wednesday, August 07, 2013

The Cult of Perpetual Victimhood

Right now the Free Staters must be happier than pigs in poo. The City of Concord, NH gave them an opportunity to engage in the two things they love most: crying about what victims they are, and relentless media whoring. 

The City of Concord has applied to the Dept. of Homeland Security for a grant to purchase a Lenco Armored Bearcat, which is also described as a tank. From Mother Jones


In an application to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) seeking more than $250,000 to purchase an armored police vehicle, the capital city of New Hampshire specified the local branch of the Occupy movement and the Free State Project, an effort to recruit "liberty-loving people" to relocate to the Granite State, as potential sources of terrorist action.
"The State of New Hampshire's experience with terrorism slants primarily towards the domestic type," the filing reads. "We are fortunate that our State has not been victimized from a mass casualty event from an international terrorism strike however on the domestic front, the threat is real and here. Groups such as the Sovereign Citizens, Free Staters and Occupy New Hampshire are active and present daily challenges."
The wailing, moaning, and gnashing of teeth from the FSP began immediately. FSP President Carla Gericke demanded an apology, in her trademark drama queen style, complete with the threat that her letter will be sent to all of their media contacts. It's surprising that she hasn't yet filed a lawsuit. Gericke is a lawyer, though she's no longer able to practice law in the state of California where she emigrated from. Regular readers will remember how the Free Staters crowed when they were able to influence the vote in the town of Weare to cut the police overtime budget. They were congratulating themselves on saving the town money. The very next day, Carla Gericke filed a 32 count lawsuit against the town, thereby negating any potential savings.
Now, to be clear, I am opposed to the town of Concord getting a tank. I'm concerned by the ongoing militarization of the police in this country. I'm also concerned that the Dept. of Homeland Security clearly has more money than it knows what to do with. DHS has only been around for about 8 years, yet they cannot pass an audit. Can't or won't. Given the kind of deals they're making with contractors it's likely that they wish to avoid public scrutiny. DHS has really put LENCO on the map, as The Equinox discovered, when the city of Keene was gearing up to purchase a Bearcat. On this much the Free Staters and I are in agreement. Sadly, now this whole issue is all about them. The Concord PD has given them the opportunity to nail themselves to the cross, and they're running with it. 
Occupy was cited as a potential threat. Occupy NH fell apart because of the Free State Project. Occupy was very specifically a non-violent movement. Free Staters who got involved refused to leave their guns at home. They insisted on wearing them at meetings, even when asked not to. It was "their right" - and when it comes to the FSP, their rights always trump the rights others. That they were making others uncomfortable didn't concern them, because FREEDUMB! Apparently one's cup of Libertea isn't served with a side dish of good manners. 
As for the Free Staters - it's true that they haven't engaged in any domestic terrorism, thus far. They claim to be a peaceful entity, though one wonders at how a group of armed colonizers can claim to have peaceful intent. (The white Europeans who colonized the west told the Indians the same thing.) I witnessed Free Staters at the near riot by gun nuts in Concord in June. They were part of the group that were shrieking at a group of unarmed people trying to have a solemn memorial vigil. They were bellowing at speakers and trying to drown them out. Is that how people intent on "peace and liberty" behave? 


So far, the answer is yes. That is how they behave, because their rights supersede those of others. Always. And the opportunity to cry victim is the very best gift that the City of Concord could have given them. When a NH State Rep aired some of her concerns about the FSP, they cried about it for months. For a good six months they flogged that horse until it was dead, had decomposed, and returned to the dust from whence it came. How dare anyone speak a word against them? OMG IT WAS THE WORST THING EVER! The poor victims of the FSP cannot tolerate Free Speech - not when it comes to anyone having the audacity to criticize them - or tell the truth about them. That they are affiliated with the John Birch Society (a known hate group), and a number of Koch Brothers funded entities is true - but they go into screaming banshee mode when it is pointed out. They are thin skinned and intolerant, as they've demonstrated time and time again. 
Thanks to the Concord PD, they have the opportunity to do it all over again. So, watch where you put your feet down, friends, because there are apt to be pearls all over the ground from all the clutching going on. 
Here's a group of Free Staters in front of the NH State House on July 4. One is reading a speech written by Adam Kokesh, a libertarian activist, who directed people around the country to read his speech in their state. The guy who is reading, clearly has the courage of his conviction, given the bandana he's wearing to obscure his face. Unfortunately, the bandana also makes him sound as if Charlie Brown's teacher is rather ineptly reading a speech from an iphone: 

It's a shame that the FSP lacks any ability for self reflection. They are an armed group coming to take over the state. Can they REALLY be surprised that some might consider them potential domestic terrorists? 

Thursday, August 01, 2013

GOP Leadership Should Take Their Shovels Away



The discussion continues on the NH House legislative email system. A system for legislators to communicate with one another  and their constituents about NH issues and legislation. 

This began as a discussion about gun bans. There isn't a gun ban proposed in NH. Why is this even being discussed? That's simple enough. The NH GOP would rather bleat about their fevered, paranoid imaginings than actually deal with the very real problems we have in this state. If only they spent all this time discussing how best to deal with NH's failing infrastructure. 


My comments are in a large, bolded format: 


From: "Vadney,Herb"
Subject: RE: Gun Ban
Date: August 1, 2013 9:37:14 AM EDT
To: "Peterson, Lenette" , "Hopper, Gary" , "Ulery, Jordan" , "Grady, Brenda" , "Emerson-Brown, Rebecca" , "Beaudoin, Steven" , "Horrigan,Timothy" , "Smith, Tim"
Cc: "Tanner, Linda" , "'Wendy A. Piper'" , ~All Representatives

I, too, am troubled by that photo.
I'll be darned if I can get it to print.
Herb


From: Peterson, Lenette
Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2013 8:50 AM
To: Hopper, Gary; Ulery, Jordan; Grady, Brenda; Emerson-Brown, Rebecca; Beaudoin, Steven; Horrigan,Timothy; Smith, Tim
Cc: Tanner, Linda; 'Wendy A. Piper'; ~All Representatives
Subject: RE: Gun Ban
Excellent job, Gary, as always most missed the boat!  Now hopefully this will end.  Go find another cause to be up in arms over, time to put this baby to bed.

Lenette M. Peterson

For those not in the know, Rep. Peterson is a Republican. It's very gracious of her to be so accepting of the drooling fratboy behavior of her male colleagues, as they objectify young women. 





From: Gary S Hopper [fourpickles@gsinet.net]
Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2013 12:52 AM
To: Ulery, Jordan; Grady, Brenda; Emerson-Brown, Rebecca; Beaudoin, Steven; Horrigan,Timothy; Smith, Tim
Cc: Tanner, Linda; 'Wendy A. Piper'; ~All Representatives
Subject: Re: Gun Ban
I wasn't going to chime in because this thread has gone on much long however the fact is I did create the picture.
I did it to draw attention to the issue of the needless killing of hundreds young people in cities like Chicago. The fact that more
people are offended by a girl in shorts rather then the hundreds of kids killed each year in Chicago is pathetic.

The fact that people keep talking about the picture of a girl in short is proof that it worked.

It is true that a teacher in school might get in trouble for using this to illustrate a point in school but your NOT in school.

Gary

Listen up, Gary:  You are an elected representative in the state of New Hampshire. Half of your constituents are women. And I'm pretty sure that ALL of those women hate dirty old men. When you post a men's magazine cheesecake photo as an attempt to 'get attention' you should not be surprised by the kind of attention you get. It's not the kind you want. When you post a picture like this, you come across as a creepy geezer: leering, drooling, and ogling young women. 

If a young woman's breasts are needed to illustrate your "facts" you're doing facts wrong. 

Your female colleagues found your soft porn picture insulting. Instead of apologizing, you keep digging. That makes you disrespectful and rude. And not very smart. 

Also - if you want to lecture a teacher, you should make sure your grammar and spelling are impeccable.







At 11:15 PM 7/31/2013, jordanulery@myfairpoint.net wrote:
I did not post the Daisy Duke. I am not defending nor objecting to the post. The purpose of advertising is to get attention. Sometimes it is a cute "animal" (Geico, Kia (dancing mice), corn flakes). Repeatedly demonstrated, across all demographics and whether it is appropriate or not, the adage applies 'sex sells'. In this instance the post was not created by a Member, it was merely cut and paste work. The post did its job - people on the list saw the stats (perhaps only after the model, but it got eye contact). If you don't 'like' the post fine, ignore it. But ignore the rather revealing underware ads in the Sunday paper as well. The post was nothing more or less than an advertisement to adults who can make their own decisions.
Sent on the Sprint® Now Network from my BlackBerry®

Here's a thought, Jordan Ulery: this isn't the Sunday paper. This isn't a lingerie ad. This isn't a television show. This isn't advertising. If you can't get your point across without attaching a set of breasts to it, than you have a communication problem. 

We have a name for people who sell sex. We call them pimps. Is that what you're aspiring to, Rep. Ulery? 


This is the list serve for the NH House of Representatives - paid for by the tax dollars of your constituents - for the purpose of doing the people's business. This discussion, and your aging fratboy ogling have nothing to do with the people's business. You disgrace the institution with this disrespectful, misogynistic nonsense. 


Your comments and this picture offended your female colleagues. Instead of apologizing, you've chosen to continue to justify your conduct, and tell them to "ignore it."  It's clear that you have no respect for your female colleagues, and that you have really bad manners. 



From: "Brenda Grady" <bbgrady@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 21:01:25 -0400
To: 'Emerson-Brown, Rebecca'<Rebecca.Emerson-Brown@leg.state.nh.us>; 'Beaudoin, Steven'<Steven.Beaudoin@leg.state.nh.us>; 'Ulery, Jordan'<jordanulery@myfairpoint.net>; 'Horrigan,Timothy'<timothy.horrigan@alumni.usc.edu>; 'Smith, Tim'<Tim.Smith@leg.state.nh.us>
Cc: 'Tanner, Linda'<tannerwindom@gmail.com>; 'Wendy A. Piper'<Wendy.A.Piper@dartmouth.edu>; 'Hopper, Gary'<fourpickles@gsinet.net>; '~All Representatives'<HReps@leg.state.nh.us>
Subject: RE: Gun Ban
I also found it offensive.  The reason given for its use, ‘to get your attention’, was also offensive as it equated us to a bunch of hormone-driven 18 year olds.  As a high school teacher for 30 years, I would have been fired for such an inappropriate way to get the attention of my students.  Even they would have known that.

Rep. Brenda Grady
Merrimack

From: Emerson-Brown, Rebecca [ mailto:Rebecca.Emerson-Brown@leg.state.nh.us]
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 6:46 PM
To: Beaudoin, Steven; Ulery, Jordan; Horrigan,Timothy; Smith, Tim
Cc: Tanner, Linda; 'Wendy A. Piper'; Hopper, Gary; ~All Representatives
Subject: RE: Gun Ban

How you find this not to be offensive is beyond me...




Rebecca Emerson-Brown

Email:Rebecca.Emerson-Brown@leg.state.nh.us
Tweet: @RebaEmerson
Post:Facebook.com/RepReba



-------- Original message --------
From: "Beaudoin, Steven" < Steven.Beaudoin@leg.state.nh.us>
Date: 07/30/2013 10:37 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: "Ulery, Jordan" < jordanulery@myfairpoint.net>,"Horrigan,Timothy" < timothy.horrigan@alumni.usc.edu>,"Smith, Tim" < Tim.Smith@leg.state.nh.us>
Cc: "Tanner, Linda" <tannerwindom@gmail.com >,"'Wendy A. Piper'" < Wendy.A.Piper@dartmouth.edu>,"Hopper, Gary" <fourpickles@gsinet.net >,~All Representatives <HReps@leg.state.nh.us>
Subject: RE: Gun Ban

Are you seriously offended by the photo? The photo just happened to be attached to facts I thought pertinent to the discussion.

Steve Beaudoin
N.H. State Representative
Strafford District 9
Rochester
332-9458

Would you have been offended if Rep. Hopper attached a picture of his penis Steve? After all, it would have just happened to be attached to facts you thought pertinent.